Rule # 1. At least half of what the other person ’ mho indemnity ship’s company tells won ’ thymine be true .
RENTAL CARS
Accident victims are entitled to recompense for all losses caused by the car accident. This includes “ loss of use ” of your car. This is measured by the prize of the use of your vehicle, not something less. You can ’ t up grade to a luxury model unless you pay the value difference but the car insurance company can not force you to downgrade either. You are entitled to fair compensation for what you actually lose .
In each of these holocene cases the insurance company ’ sulfur insured negligently caused the total loss of the accident victim ’ randomness vehicle. In each case the car accident victim was told that the car insurance company was creditworthy only for rental of a $ 25 per day sub-compact rather than the full sized vehicle that was destroyed. The car crash victim was told they had to pay to “ upgrade ” to the car they were entitled to ! This is not true. If you encounter this type of tactic margin call an have Vancouver Washington personal wound and car crash lawyer .
Total Loss Valuation
As personal injury attorneys we see a lot of tactics designed to minimize the come a person injured in a cable car crash recovers. One tactic is using trader pricing of deal in vehicles. The most park however are computerize valuations. These valuations do not actually value your car. They prize a theoretical “ average ” car based on numerous vehicles that are allegedly for sale or have allegedly sold for specific prices .
In such a sum loss valuation performed by the insurance party for the negligent driver I found the same meaning “ errors ” had been used to downgrade the amount paid for the hurt driver ’ sulfur car. Comparison vehicles were misidentified as to class and options. Options the loss vehicle had were ignored. Further scrutiny of the evaluation showed more serious deficiencies .
We requested copies of everything the negligent driver ’ second indemnity company used to value the damaged vehicles. I then began making calls to the automobile dealers listed to make surely the comparison vehicles in truth are comparable. What I found made me question the entire full loss valuation procedure. In a very holocene shell State Farm found two cars about identical to the loss vehicle. Both were valued at just over $ 5,300. A third base car that was purportedly on a use car lot was added to the shuffle. That one was valued at $ 3,200 with a small lend on for its poor people discipline it was valued at $ 3,500. Using that car to drag the average down resulted in taking $ 500 from the see .
Hint : demand the evaluation documents, all of them.
You will get a composition many pages long. There will be anywhere from a half twelve to a twelve or more “ comparable ” cars. The most obvious question is “ Why do you need to “ compare ” 15 vehicles when you have 3 or 4 that are about EXACTLY the same as my car ? ” The reason is that using a lot of “ comparable sales ” drags the average value polish. This is particularly true because the computer course of study “ devalues ” the cars being used as “ comparable ” then devalues your car on the basis of the devalue cars. If you have an average or downstairs median car, the arrangement might be all right but if you have a newer car or one with moo miles, your car will be under valued .
Hint : Do your own research into the measure of your car, two very exchangeable cars are a better meter of value than 15 mismatches .
On the evaluation you will see the source of valuations reported. Telephone calls to the dealers who had allegedly quoted “ consider prices ” produced concern results. In one case the person quoted had no authority to set a price, he could merely convey offers. In the second case I learned that the vehicle had already been sold for more than the allege “ take price ”. Check craigslist.org, car trader and other sales sources .
Hint : Research the autos used to produce the valuation .
Review the “ comparable ” cars and look for “ outliers ”. These are cars that sold for manner below what alike cars sold for. To drag the price down these “ ardor sale ” cars are left in the appraisal. The alleged sale price is not adjusted up to reflect desperation sales or other factors. entirely cars sold in a bona fide transaction should be counted. The definition is : ” an arms length transaction between a willing buyer who does not have to buy and a will seller who does not have to sell. ” Outliers have no commercial enterprise in the valuation procedure .
BONUS HINT: I often hear from people who have been told that the adjuster can ’ triiodothyronine regard comparable cars outside the valuation the policy company came up with. That is not true. Ask to speak to a supervisory program if this trick is pulled on you .
BONUS BONUS: The best comparable sale is your purchase of your car. If you recently purchased he cable car in a bona fide transaction that is adenine dependable a evaluation as can be found, demand it be considered particularly if you improved the car after you bought it.
Valuation methods like “ CCC ” and “ Autosource ” trust on a evaluation method acting that does not actually appraise your car. It appraises a fabulous vehicle. If they truly wanted to value your vehicle they would find two or three identical like vehicles, they would not search eminent and low for arsenic many vehicles of the approximate year, make and model as they can, toss out those they think sold for excessively much and then run an average .